OPOTA Practice Exam 2025 – Complete Study Guide for Your Test

The term 'Denial of Victim' refers to the belief or argument that the person who has been harmed or victimized somehow deserved or brought about their own victimization. This rationale implies that the victim's circumstances, behaviors, or characteristics justify the perpetrator's actions. It operates under a flawed narrative that shifts blame from the offender to the victim, thus minimizing the responsibility of the person who committed the harm.

This concept often emerges in discussions regarding crime, domestic violence, or any scenario where there is a clear victim-perpetrator dynamic. By claiming that the victim deserved the outcome they suffered, it fosters a harmful mindset that excuses or rationalizes abusive behavior, detracting from the seriousness of the crime committed against them. In contrast, the other potential choices do not align with the concept of 'Denial of Victim' as they either acknowledge responsibility, claim no harm was done, or suggest a lack of choices, which does not directly address the victim's role in the narrative promoted by those employing denial arguments.